Why do people do bad
things? Most pressingly, why do people do bad things when they know they are
bad? The entire film centers itself around a brilliantly quotidian answer to
this question: It’s hard to be a good person.
Human perfection,
seen universally in cultures as a form of spiritual virtuosity, is virtually
impossible. Hence the mythologies of individuals who are deemed superhuman for
their righteous tenacity. Indeed, these few men have carved entire worlds out
of the mystique of their spirituality.
If it is impractical
then to be a perfect moral agent, why even bother? At its crudest, it is to
prevent harming others that we are devoted to. If we seek out the best for the
ones we love, then acting impiously counter-acts the effort to nurture and
support what we love, our very ends in themselves.
The film challenges
immorality and its harm to loved ones very explicitly. We see the damage
wrought, and the consequences as devastating, by those who found living above
our crude animal desires as difficult.
This raises an
interesting question on the basis of the drive of human will. Human freedom in
itself does not grant that one’s actions will be virtuous. The obvious
wrongness of certain actions-as made clear in the film-do not illuminate the
general concept of morality itself. Is it sufficient to say that acting how we
instinctually want is not always righteous? Why is it so hard to live beyond
our instincts?
Ultimately, we have
a Christian paradigm depicted to us: that the long causal chain of sin persists
in creating human imperfection. Yet we return to challenging this paradigm: why
does immorality continue to have momentum? In this particular vignette of sin,
there is nothing external to the lives of this family which causes such
destruction, other than willful disregard of living for something beyond what
one simply wants.
Is this what is
truthfully difficult for man to do? Emphatically yes. Finding purpose is the
ultimate challenge in living. While not preoccupied on such a profound
meditation, life can become dull when it is relaxed. The animal of human is
always searching for something to direct his will towards. And oftentimes, this
directs itself toward a self-indulgent affinity, which is inescapable.
The cultivation of
self-discipline is the enterprise of religion itself; and thus with its decay, living
at the peak of mediocrity creates a void which must be filled, irrespective of
how irrational filling this void becomes.
The fact human
history’s most influential members dictate their self-disciplines indicates the
significance of combating the dichotomy of good and evil. Very succinctly, with
four people, The Vicious Kind
exposes the paramount value of religion in society. When families begin harming
themselves, as true signs of the absence of any love outside of oneself, we
have a self-destructed society, which can no longer persist as it has.
Grade: A
No comments:
Post a Comment